During our research for the Necronomicon Files, John and I came across a number of writers who commented on the Necronomicon. Most of them, sad to say, have been ill-informed and inaccurate. After the book's deadline, I ran across a copy of William and Sharon Schnoebelen's Lucifer Dethroned, from the infamous Chick Publications, in which the couple discusses their involvement in the occult and subsequent conversion to Christianity. While John and I do not agree with their positions on non-mainstream religions (or their assertions of a vast Satanic conspiracy), I can see that they have genuine knowledge of such traditions as Wicca, Satanism, ceremonial magic, and others. I chose to write about their work for a number of reasons:
Let's begin with their treatment of Lovecraft in Lucifer Dethroned.
This paragraph contains several slight inaccuracies. Lovecraft never wrote books; instead, he published his stories in the pulp magazines of the day. Save for one worked a fan published (The Shadow over Innsmouth), Lovecraft never saw his stories collected in book form. Out of the stories described, only "The Colour out of Space" could be called a blend of horror and science fiction. The glaring error here is "The Dweller on the Threshold". The story's real title is "The Lurker at the Threshold", and most scholars consider it a story by August Derleth with only a few paragraphs of Lovecraft's work.
Nit-picking? Perhaps. But let's continue.
I nearly fell out of my chair when I read this. Those of you who've read the George Hay Necronomicon should be familiar with this story - it's the same one Colin Wilson uses to explain why Lovecraft knew about the "real" Necronomicon. Of course, Wilson has since repudiated this story, but it is taken as literal fact here.
The inaccuracies here are legion. Lovecraft never experimented with magic, even going so far as to begin a collaborative work against superstition with his friend C. M. Eddy and the magician Harry Houdini. While Lovecraft's marriage to Sonia Greene was unsuccessful, it was nonetheless a legal one. While Lovecraft's works do describe the sea and underground as horrific places, Lovecraft seems to have had no particular fear of them, as his trips to Charleston, Florida, and the Endless Caverns of Virginia testify. Lovecraft studies were not as advanced in 1993 as they are now, but even then the standard work on Lovecraft's Life, de Camp's Lovecraft: A Biography, contradicted all of these points.
Let's continue with the book's take on the Necronomicon.
As John and I show in the Files, the Necronomicon is the creation of H. P. Lovecraft, who inspired a number of hoax books based on his work. As for his translation, I've never seen the "tones" one before, and "names" is considered flawed by S. T. Joshi, among others.
Occultist Aleister Crowley was interested in Egyptian religion, but his god of choice seems to have been Horus, the hawk-headed warrior who opposed Set. As John will show in the Files, neither Crowley nor any of the published Necronomicons have much to do with Middle Eastern paganism, even though they both used some of its elements. I should note that "Abdul Alhazred" was a play-name of Lovecraft's when he was young.
Of course, the Schnoebelens give us no hint of where the "actual", "full" Necronomicon might be found. I cannot be sure of the dedication in the original, but the paperback on my shelf reads "Ad Meiorum Cthulhi Gloriam" - "To the greater glory of Cthulhu."
Lucifer Dethroned goes on to describe the disastrous fates of a cat and a young girl who were unfortunate enough to be present when the proud owners of new Necronomicons brought their purchases home. We encourage you to read Lucifer Dethroned and decide on their validity for yourself, but we try to hold our noses when we read the passages in question.
2002 © Daniel Harms. All rights reserved. The works of William and Sharon Schnoebelen are quoted here for purposes of commentary, and no challenge to their rights is intended.